While our leaders take, once again, the wrong decisions to exit the crisis Europe, there are other solutions:
Independence with regard to the markets :
Because of the decision in 1973 of Giscard to ban all the France Bank loan to the French State, and then by article 123 of the Treaty of Lisbon, Member States of UE can no longer borrow from their Central Bank or the European Bank. They are forced to borrow on the market to bankers who lend money at usurious interest rates ; therefore prior to 1973 and the Maastricht Treaty, the States could borrow from their central bank rates zeros.
Then, it is urgent to get out of this system imposed by the incompetent technocrats in the EU. Urgent that article 123 of the Treaty of Lisbon be removed and limited the power of creation of the currency to the central banks of the countries of the EU and removed that given to commercial banks that create artificial currencies based on the credit. It should be separate banks from commercial banks.
The essential reforms to reduce the social deficits and grow the economy :
In France, reduce deficits, to impose equality between the private and the public in all areas: working time, wages, pensions, bonuses etc. It is also, considerably lower expenditures of the State reducing its train of life, and removing all the privileges of its officials. It must reduce the bureaucracy and the public service, remove levels of the administrative pyramid and policy.
We must fight against corruption and waste. Remove all aids to non-French immigrants, end with etatism and make that the country is administered as economically as possible, and not governed, by the most competent representatives in their sector of activity etc.
To grow the economy, lower charges on wages and lower taxes, free the spirit of enterprise of any obstacles and bureaucratic hassles. It must promote innovation. Do not make a policy of austerity which will cause a global crisis, as in 1929.
Is the EU not a utopia?
A union of countries which do not have the same economic and social levels is an absurdity.
If the EU had operated between member countries, social and tax harmonisation, but nothing has been done. As there was no social and tax harmonisation following the liberalization of trade in the EU, unfair competition (dumping) is created between the least developed countries and those with higher social protection and a heavier taxation, even if they have increased productivity, causing relocations in the EU and transforming partners in competitors, which is contrary to the purpose of the EU: the association of countries and the end of national rivalries.
The problem of the debt of the States:
In addition to their social and fiscal disparity, each country does not have the same level of productivity and competitiveness, therefore some countries have no sufficiently developed economies to service their debt and are completely dependent on the spirit of solidarity of the more developed countries within the EU, which is not shared by all States (Germany etc.).
Assistance to highly indebted governments, through a European support fund, is a generous gesture face to countries which have mismanaged their finances, but without the dependence of market output, the EU will make the bankruptcy, could not repay the debt of the indebted States and the interests of their debt, and new loans (with interests) that the EU will be obliged to make, because of the rise of interest rates that banks distortions will require States, then that they come to be saved by those same States !
Also, repay the debt, it is remain in logic continue to pay interests to crooks who forced States to borrow their money, the most part of policy makers to assess the impact of such compulsion, in view of their ignorance in economics and finance.
Finally, even an exponential growth could no longer support the Government’s European debt.
It must therefore out of this federalist and technocratic Europe and allow indebted countries to resume their independence, to return to their national currency to equal with the euro parity, do redeem their debt by their Central Bank or cancel it, devalue their currency if necessary, regain their independence vis à vis of speculators and make the structural reforms needed for each country.
One example to justify such measures: the amount of the French debt is interests paid, since 1973, to commercial banks by the French State!
End this technocratic and centralist Europe :
For all the social and economic reasons explained above, it must return to a confederal Europe, where each country will find again its currency and economic independence.
Should no longer a currency unique but common, to promote exchanges between the countries of the EU and others.
Therefore, put an end to the federalism
But if some Atlanticists Commissioners and in the pay of the Bilderberg club, want not to remove section 123 of the Treaty of Lisbon, that the EU remains under the domination of a few Jewish banks (Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuh Loeb in New York, the Rothschild in Paris and London, the Warburg of Hambourd, the Lazards in Paris and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome) and of US, hidden behind the FED, the City, the IMF, all the central banks of Europe ; then he must be out of Europe on the steps of the policy of General de Gaulle.